Introduction
Smartphones are important gadgets to promote literacy, but on the other hand, they have hijacked our minds, making us depend on them like companions. It has been found that as we use our phones, it becomes difficult to distinguish tacit knowledge and the information in our phones. This inclination, where users of the phone assume they know a lot as it is provided in the smartphone, has created a generation of delusive intellectuals with little to know about them. Also, it has been discovered that as gadgets provide data access to users, it has led to knowledge dwindling among different people. In this case, information available in digital form has given birth to a generation of people with less mental wit and effort, hence making people have less knowledge because it weakens their ability to recall and remember. This paper will argue that mobile phone use hijacks people's minds by influencing their reasoning and other inclinations concerning decision-making (Hire Dissertation writer experts).
Response
The article by Carr points out important concepts and ideas about mobile phone hijacking people's minds which interfere with their reasoning, decision-making, and knowledge. Based on this statement, the author's argument supports this claim by saying that " the division of attention impedes reasoning and performance" because mobile phones act as a constant distraction that tends to lower people's concentration on what they are doing (Carr 2). In this case, I say that the author's argument and ideology that phones are a constant distraction is true to some extent because it has made people slave over these gadgets. Without them, most of us will not function since it resets us to refractory settings. However, sometimes with discipline and self-control, the mobile phone cannot be a distractor because it takes a habit to do away with undesired traits like continuous use and dependency on the phone. It has been demonstrated through experiment, and I strongly reaffirm that the author's argument are correct because we live in an era of technology. Almost every part of the world is now supplied with the internet and mobile phones, making users join the web and be part of the globalization drive to interact and connect. For instance, there are plenty of social platforms that make people interact and establish bonds. As a result, constant texting and conversation interfere with the historical approach of how people interact face to face. This makes people constantly chat and text each other, making it a constant distraction when someone is supposed to be doing something constructive. In this case, this makes users of mobile phones constantly have altered attention due to the distraction that these gadgets can induce. Therefore, continued use of mobile phones and their distraction negatively affects our performance and lowers our reason (Contact term paper writers using this link).
Additionally, mobile phones have hijacked our minds by affecting our fluid intelligence and cognitive capacity, leading to decreased brainpower to perform tasks. In this case, the experiment was used to determine how mobile phones' proximity interfere with how user concentrate and perform different activities. According to the argument by Carr (2), mobile phone use during proactive activities interferes with brainpower to work properly because it constantly impedes how we reason and make decisions about things. On the other hand, I agree with the other to some degree, mobile phone proximity tends to keep someone anxious, especially when they are to talk with someone or do something, and from this standpoint, it can draft someone's mind to this hence making them not to be productive. In this case, I say that proximity to mobile phones does not necessarily affect our brainpower because the mind requires something else to distract it from routine mobile phone use. This led to a high level of concentration to achieve the desired results. The author's argument from this standpoint is incorrect because there needs to be a factor that had to be considered, such as phone messages alert, ringing, and others, for it to impact people's brainpower, but at times someone can forget whether they have a phone after being preoccupied with other things. This is the middle ground the authors failed to consider to make this inference and conclusion. Therefore, the nearness of phones can distract someone or not depending on the degree to which they have been dependent on the gadget. In this case, concentration on a particular task is determined by how willing a person is, driven by the mind. A willing mind with determination can overcome anything, even the worst temptation or distraction, to achieve the "now" goal.
Moreover, the author has supported the claim that mobile phone hijack people's mind because continued access to online data make them have less knowledge about things around them, and this makes it hard to differentiate fluid or tacit knowledge from that of the information found on our gadgets(Carr 5). In this case, I concur with the author's argument and idea because the continuous use of mobile phones led to over-information associated with misinformation. In the long run, it makes our minds have less stimulus to learn something because we get the assurance that we have plenty of information and can access it anytime we need it. The authors are correct because when people progressively use mobile phones to access online data, it makes them absorb much from what they have read because there is a lot to be gained, making it difficult to remember (Carr 4). However, there is a middle ground of the argument in which the author failed to consider which passion and literacy capacity of each person or group. In this case, some people consume information because they need to, and they help them know about many things around them and across the globe. Therefore, to some extent, mobile phone use has hijacked our minds by affecting our brainpower, knowledge, reasoning, and decision-making, affecting our social and intellectual capacity and capabilities. Living in an era of information and the internet makes everything we need in the form of data readily accessible. This makes people lazy to study to remember when they know, it's there and safe in storage form.
Conclusion
In conclusion, mobile phones have interfered with our minds because they affect our reasoning, knowledge, social life, and decision-making capability. There have been various arguments presented by Carr, the author, based on how mobile phones act as constant distractions to our activities and tasks hence wearing our brainpower, concentration, and performance. It has been concluded that mobile phones negatively impact our minds, and we need time to replenish our mental capacity by distancing ourselves from the gadget to allow ourselves to think and realize what clouded our judgment.
